Scope — reach and depth matter
We count how many people benefit and how deeply, and favour work that helps more people more.
Resources are limited and needs are great, so ACSI asks one question of every choice we make: how do we do the most good with what we have? Our approach draws on the principles of effective altruism a practical, evidence-based way of deciding where time and money help the most people.
We count how many people benefit and how deeply, and favour work that helps more people more.
We target by need and burden, using data, rather than by where we are most familiar.
We monitor to learn what works, and we share what we learn, including what did not work.
A shilling spent on one thing cannot be spent on another, so we compare options and say what we will not do.
Before starting new joint programmes, our members score priority problems on three simple questions.
How much good would solving this problem do?
How little is already being done about it?
How much would extra resources actually solve?
The three scores are multiplied, so a problem that is huge but has no workable solution does not outrank one where progress is realistic. We then ask whether ACSI members are well placed to act present, trusted and with a way to deliver. The screen guides our discussion; communities and members still decide.
For example, the cost per child immunised or per young person supported into work.
We ask what would have happened without us, and we do not claim credit for change that was already happening.
A secure base that delivers a complete result, plus ready-to-fund extensions that partners can support when resources allow.
We keep community voice at the centre, work through government systems wherever possible, value hard-to-measure work such as advocacy and stigma reduction, and treat rights and equity as non-negotiable.
Contact us for our current priority programmes and costed partnership options.